Abstract

Silcrete heat treatment, along with a suit of other innovations, have been used to argue for an early onset of modern or complex behaviours in Middle Stone Age hominins. This practice was confined to South Africa’s southern and western Cape regions where it was continuously practised since the Still Bay industry. However, the exact moment that this technological advancement occurred still remains unclear. This is partly due to the scarcity of silcrete assemblages dating to the first half of the Middle Stone Age. To determine when silcrete heat treatment began to be well-established, we compare the silcrete assemblages from two archaeological sites situated along the south western coast of South Africa: Hoedjiespunt 1, one of the earliest Middle Stone Age silcrete assemblages dating to 119–130 ka, and Duinefontein 2, one of the latest Early Stone Age assemblages dating to 200–400 ka. Our results suggest that the invention of heat treatment occurred sometime between 130 ka and 200–400 ka, as it is still absent in the earlier assemblage but fully mastered and well-integrated in the recent one. This period corresponds to the time that Homo sapiens became the major hominin species in the southern African subcontinent and it is roughly the time that silcrete use became widespread in the second half of the Cape-coastal Middle Stone Age. This opens interesting new questions on the relation between silcrete use and heat treatment and on why early modern humans spontaneously invented heat treatment when they began using silcrete in the Cape region.

Highlights

  • Silcrete heat treatment is commonly understood as a technical process that aims at improving the quality of raw materials for knapping

  • It has in the past decade become one of the arguments for an early onset of modern or complex behaviours in the Middle Stone Age (MSA)

  • When heat treatment was first documented at Pinnacle Point (Brown et al, 2009), the main argument was made for the Howiesons Poort (HP; roughly dated to 50–85 ka, depending on what site it was found at)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Silcrete heat treatment is commonly understood as a technical process that aims at improving the quality of raw materials for knapping. It has been argued that heat treatment might not have been practised to improve knapping quality but rather for heatfracturing raw material blocks, to reduce nodule size before knapping even began (Schmidt et al, 2015; Porraz et al, 2016) This argument was proposed because at some sites, many silcrete blocks broke from the action of fire before knapping (see for example: Schmidt et al, 2015; Delagnes et al, 2016). If this were the case, the entire MSA heat treatment signal might not reflect any human activity at all

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call