Abstract
AbstractThis essay uses a critical sociocultural perspective to examine Osborne's review of an essay written by Furtak and Penuel. This essay highlights dichotomous thinking and positivist/postpositivist perspective underpinning Osborne's discourse and argues that an integrative and inclusive orientation is more advantageous for science education researchers conducting research in an increasingly diverse world in demography and views. An integrative and inclusive approach to research requires an understanding and engagement with positionality, power associated with one's perceived or actual political and social location in a society.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
