Abstract

Moral bioenhancement for future space missions, like radical forms of biomedical human enhancements in general, seems at first glance a reasonable idea. This is due to the harsh conditions of the space environment, as well as the high cost and difficulty of implementing long-term and long-distance space missions. However, it turns out that this most controversial type of human enhancement, which is biomodification of morality, can also bring many risks for such a demanding environment as that of future long-distance space missions. The object of this paper is to polemicize the philosophy of moral bioenhancement proposed by Henri Huttunen and Oskari Sivula and to supplement their point of view with important but missing contexts.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.