Abstract
In India, attempts to stimulate a formal market for affordable housing, by privatizing, deregulating and promoting the private sector funding for housing and infrastructure, as an alternative to the provision by the government, have not been very successful. This study offers as an explanation that the intended market did not arise because the new policy did not take into account the existing institutional structure that regulates the (informal) provision of affordable housing. The existing structure relies heavily on clientelism which, in effect, is serving as an alternative to the market. Therefore, just changing the formal institutions of housing and land policy will not necessarily bring about the desired change in the provision of housing. This is illustrated by the case of informal housing in Raipur.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
