Abstract

We naively believe that L1 is easier to hear than L2. Generally, this belief is correct, but not always. Japanese contrastive focus is more challenging to identify than English focus even for L1 speakers. To account for why Japanese is hard to perceive, we first conducted production and perception experiments, to understand linguistic mechanisms. We found that Japanese lacks a part of focus effects and is an acoustically weak language contra previous studies. English, on the other hand, is an acoustically strong language and uses the F0 feature as a focus cue. We then conducted an fMRI experiment to see whether or not linguistic mechanisms for them are implemented in the brain. We found that we employ different neural networks to process English and Japanese; the right dorsolateral frontal cortex is activated to process Japanese CF, but not English CF. Japanese is a pitch language and requires processing both lexical accents and pitch contours. English, on the other hand, needs to process lexical accent only, and it activates left superior temporal gyrus, insular, and supramargical regions, but not right dorsolateral frontal cortex. We conclude that processing burdens lead to perception difficulty, even for L1 Japanese speakers.

Highlights

  • Speakers produce, and listeners perceive certain parts of an utterance as more or less prominent

  • Our prediction is borne out; Japanese contrastive focus is harder to identify than English contrastive focus, even though Japanese is the L1 of the participants

  • We further conducted supplementary perception experiments with non-native speakers of Japanese, to see whether or not Japanese contrastive focus is difficult to hear with L3 speakers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Listeners perceive certain parts of an utterance as more or less prominent. To highlight prominence in an utterance, prosody – part of the acoustic information – plays an important role. Previous cross-linguistic studies on prosody (cf Cole et al 2010, 2019, Bauman and Winter 2018, among others) have found that prosodic cues vary among individuals and languages. Lee et al (2015) conducted a cross-linguistic perception experiment of contrastive focus, using ten-digit numbers of the form XXX-XXX-XXXX, where one number in the series was with focus under a Question-Answer sequence as in (1). Giving them only the response, we asked participants to identify which number was focused

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call