Why fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES)?

Abstract

As flexible endoscopy has moved into the mainstream, gastroenterologists have embraced many of the skills and techniques particular to this modality of diagnosis and intervention. Their adoption of flexible endoscopic technology and training, and the lack of enthusiasm for endoscopic therapy potentials by surgeons, has left many surgical residents and practicing surgeons deficient in endoscopic skills. As a result, education of surgical residents in flexible endoscopy has lagged and training of surgical residents in flexible endoscopy is increasingly coming under scrutiny and has become an area of debate. The medical literature and practice guidelines are replete with articles from surgeons and gastroenterologists debating the appropriate education and training in flexible endoscopy. Both surgical and gastroenterology professional societies have published guidelines for training in flexible endoscopy. These guidelines are often at odds with each other, citing opposing literature supporting their position on appropriate criteria for training in basic upper and lower endoscopy [1–4]. Flexible endoscopy is a critical element of any general surgeon’s and colorectal surgeon’s practice. In 2007, 74 % of rural surgeons performed more than 50 flexible endoscopic procedures each year, with 42 % of rural surgeons performing more than 200 flexible endoscopic procedures annually [5]. In a 2010 report on rural, under-served areas that lack gastroenterology services, 39.8 % of an American general surgeons’ practice comprises flexible endoscopic procedures [6]. In Canada, surgeons were found to be the primary providers of flexible endoscopic services in smaller urban and rural areas [7]. The American Board of Surgery (ABS) has begun to address the training inequity that exists between general surgery residents and gastroenterology fellows [8]. In an effort to ensure surgical residents are fully trained and competent in flexible endoscopy, the ABS has not only increased the minimum requirements for training general surgery residents in flexible endoscopy but has also undertaken the task of formalizing a flexible endoscopy curriculum for its residents. Currently, the ABS and Residency Review Committee (RRC) recommend 35 upper endoscopic procedures and 50 colonoscopies as the minimum number of procedures to be performed by surgical residents. The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and the ABS have long espoused that numbers do not ensure competency in surgical or endoscopic procedures. This position is fully supported by data. In 2004, the SAGES esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) Outcomes Study Group prospectively reviewed 3,525 EGDs performed by surgeons, showing a high degree of success with low morbidity. There was no correlation between experience (i.e. number of cases performed) and completion rates or major complications [9]. A similar trial by the SAGES Colonoscopy Study Outcomes Group prospectively reviewed 13,580 colonoscopies performed by surgeons and found no correlation between experience and complications, with an acceptable success rate. The investigators noted that a minimum of 50 colonoscopies with 100 performed annually showed a significant improvement in completion rates Taskforce Members are listed in Appendix.