Abstract
Engineers often consider their foremost responsibility to serve the public good, seeing themselves as the translators of science to technology for the benefit of the public. Yet, engineers often find themselves as the villains in public/private conflicts. The public sees engineers as the despoilers of the environment, the diligent destroyers, the tools of the establishment. This image confuses engineers who believe that they perform the function for which they were educated and for which there is public demand. The present paper suggests that the confusion is the result of differing philosophical outlooks between the engineers and the public at large. The majority of the public believes that standard engineering tools such as cost/benefit analyses are unethical, whereas the engineers believe that these techniques allow for the most fair distribution of benefit and cost. The engineering codes of ethics are a mirror of the engineers' utilitarian nature, and promote this paternalistic nature of engineering. ...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
