Abstract
The CCSD(T) method was originally motivated as an attempt to treat the effects of triply excited determinants upon both single and double excitation operators on an equal footing. Hence, conventional analyses based on perturbation theory cannot satisfactorily explain why the particular fifth-order term included in CCSD(T) should be chosen over a number of other possibilities. This work demonstrates that the terms appearing in CCSD(T) can be justified if one takes the biorthogonal representation of the CCSD state as the zeroth-order wavefunction. This perspective provides some additional insight as to why the method works so well in practice.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
