Whooping and sandhill cranes visit upland ponds proportional to migration phenology on the Texas coast

Abstract

AbstractTwo crane species, whooping cranes (Grus americana) and sandhill cranes (Antigone canadensis), overwinter along the Texas Gulf Coast. Periodic, extreme drought conditions have prompted concerns that potential freshwater limitations could hinder conservation of cranes, especially endangered whooping cranes. In response, land managers constructed and maintained freshwater ponds in upland areas near saltmarshes on the wintering grounds. We monitored 30 of those constructed ponds using camera traps (1 Oct 2013–31 May 2014) to quantify crane visits. For each species, we modeled pond visits as a function of migration phenology and environmental variables at 2 scales. Pond‐scale variables included distance to saltmarsh and monthly salinity, and broad‐scale variables included bay salinity, drought index, and tide level. We found pond visits by both crane species followed migration phenology with the greatest pond use in January–February. Both crane species visited ponds more on the mainland than on Matagorda Island. Sandhill crane visits were fewer at ponds with higher salinities and those filled by well water. Cranes visited ponds during the diurnal period and tended to avoid visiting ponds during the first 10% of the day. Pond visits by whooping cranes were ≤0.15 times/pond/day and by sandhill cranes were ≤0.28 times/pond/day. Our results suggested crane visits to constructed ponds may not be as frequent as once assumed nor driven by tidal and salinity conditions in the bay. The greater number of crane visits to constructed ponds on the mainland compared to Matagorda Island may be related to shrub encroachment around natural freshwater swale wetlands on the mainland, which is not as prevalent of a problem on the island. With proper management, swales on the mainland may provide alternatives to constructed ponds for cranes to obtain freshwater and forage.