Abstract
This essay discusses the accountability of international actors within the Dayton framework. It argues that the international administration of Bosnia-Herzegovina suffers from an accountability deficit – a deficit that appears all the more acute as the Dayton peace agreement approaches its ten-year anniversary. Limited accountability does not mean the total absence of mechanisms for local scrutiny but, as is analysed here, these mechanisms are extremely limited. While international territorial administrations are not representative democracies, and in important respects should not be held to the standards of a liberal democratic state, more effort can and should be made to ensure a greater degree of accountability to the local population. The essay concludes with some suggestions as to how this could be achieved.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.