Whitehead’in Postmodern Felsefi Perspektifinden Kendini Belirleyen Dindar Oluş

Abstract

With his new ontology theory, Whitehead is one of the philisophers who managed to break the rigidity of the determinist existence desing of modern philosophy. What he says about casual relationships changes our design of the universe, confined to the strict boundaries of modern determinism. From a determinist point of view, the universe operates in a linear linearity depending on the close cause and effect relationship. Whereas, under the multiple casualty forms that Whitehead thinks, this process is in a scale that cannot be reduced to near cause and effect. According to the philosopher, all the experience situations the make up the existence are actualized with multilayered causality relations. Even God, where traditional culture are often isolated from relationships in order to make them privileged, actively participates in the sharing of causality and actually experiences the process. Therefore, it is clear that a philosophical system whose ontological structure is established in this way will say something new about the experience of religiousness, which is an interpretation of the God-human relationship. In this framework, the causality forms produced by Whitehead were applied to religious experience. In particular, it is debatable how the self-causality form from these causality forms can affect the religious experience. The concept of self-determining religiousness produced by us was produced as a result of this discussion. Like any experience, religious experiece is related to the principle of self-determination. Therefore, an individual who realize this is expected to establish her religious experience in accordance with the ontological quality of the experience. The article tries to develop perspectives on how to establish that relati-onship, in accordance with the demonstration of this purpose. The self-determining concept of religiousness was created in inspiration from concepts such as the imperceptible becoming, woman-literary-animal becoming, which Deleuze uses to show the diversity of possible occurrences. Especially the process between the two philosophers, the formation based thought partnreship enables such inspiration.