Abstract

In recent years urban agriculture has gained the attention of policy-makers, social organizers, and academics alike. This new wave of work and attention focuses on projects that ameliorate issues ranging from food insecurity to urban blight, and environmental degradation to the subversion of industrial food production. These projects consist of a variation of community gardens, educational programs, demonstration farms, and entrepreneurial production farms (I will identify all of these under the umbrella of urban agriculture (UA)). However, by simply studying the social impact of UA, researchers fail to consider who the active agent is in social change; this results in little acknowledgement of a movement that is predominately white, hegemonic, and exclusive. As a movement, UA is largely championed by a middle-class white populace as part of the alternative food movement, rather than being understood as having historical roots in predominately black and/or Latino neighborhoods. As a result, urban agriculture generally creates white in otherwise black or Latino places. In this paper I will argue for a new research direction that considers UA from a critical race theory framework and that will allow researchers to examine how urban agriculture might create white spaces and white ethics in predominately black and Latino neighborhoods. Understanding UA from a critical race theory framework will be useful in helping the UA movement talk about food sovereignty rather than food insecurity in urban communities.

Highlights

  • A s a subset of the alternative food movement, urban agriculture (UA) places a high emphasis on its role of positively impacting fresh food accessibility and security (Ball, Timperio, & Crawford, 2009; Gatrell, Reid, & Ross, 2011; Gottlieb & Joshi, 2010; Teig, Amulya, Bardwell, Buchenau, Marshall, & Litt, 2009; Walker, Keane, & Burke, 2010), urban blight and decay through greening (Gottlieb & Joshi, 2010; Metcalf & Widener, 2011), and developing social capital (Henderson & Hartsfield, 2009; Teig et al, 2009)

  • Despite the various models and different outcomes, one aspect persists throughout the recent surge in urban agriculture: it is a whitedominated practice primarily occurring in neighborhoods with high concentrations of African American and Latino communities, with little participation from within those communities

  • This white farmer/gardener, working in a neighborhood where African Americans make up more than 80 percent of the population, began to explain to me that there is a lack of diversity among urban growers, and that it is difficult to get communities of color to buy into farming and fresh food

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A s a subset of the alternative food movement, urban agriculture (UA) places a high emphasis on its role of positively impacting fresh food accessibility and security (Ball, Timperio, & Crawford, 2009; Gatrell, Reid, & Ross, 2011; Gottlieb & Joshi, 2010; Teig, Amulya, Bardwell, Buchenau, Marshall, & Litt, 2009; Walker, Keane, & Burke, 2010), urban blight and decay through greening (Gottlieb & Joshi, 2010; Metcalf & Widener, 2011), and developing social capital (Henderson & Hartsfield, 2009; Teig et al, 2009). Despite the various models and different outcomes, one aspect persists throughout the recent surge in urban agriculture: it is a whitedominated practice primarily occurring in neighborhoods with high concentrations of African American and Latino communities, with little participation from within those communities.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call