Abstract
Tax havens are one of the main areas of concern in contemporary tax policy, especially in these times of strenuous budgetary tension and outrageous tax fraud scandals. This article analyses the nature of tax havens and reflects on contemporary tax policy experiences in order to argue in favour of a definition based on the elements of secrecy and intent to escape tax burdens coupled with an examination of tax systems, services provided, functional structure, and the jurisdiction's attitudinal display. Having identified traditional conceptions of fiscal sovereignty, lack of medium- and long-term strategies, and ignoring the demand side of the equation as hurdles that prevent real progress, this article is concluded by formulating a series of tax policy recommendations that emphasize the importance of combined flexible conditionality-multilateral efforts to articulate the interests of the four main actors involved in tax havens (tax haven jurisdictions, users, financial intermediaries, and tax residence jurisdictions that are trying to recover revenue) in a network of cooperative strategies that provide: (1) economic substitution alternatives, (2) improvements of domestic tax systems so as to bolster legitimacy and reduce tax haven demand, and (3) which seek to attack societal complacency with tax fraud.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.