Abstract
The performance of a number of response surface designs for estimating a quadratic response surface model in symmetric experimerltal regions, k-spheres and hypercubes, is compared. The designs compared are composite designs, Box-Behnken designs, Uniform Shell designs, Hoke designs, Pesotchinsky designs, and Box-Draper designs. The performance criteria for the designs are their D-efficiency and their G-efficiency. All of the compared designs have high efficiencies. For large numbers of factors designs hnving higher efficiencies do exist; however, these designs have not yet been discovered.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
