Abstract
Abundance and biomass estimates are metrics usually taken for phytoplankton assays. Biomass is a proxy measure today in phytoplankton assays, while relative abundance is broadly used in diatoms investigations and application of ecological indexes. The question is how the two metrics respond to environmental conditions, based on diatoms species composition, in the plankton of lotic system, using the same statistical approach. The investigation was carried out based on monthly plankton sampling in four rivers during an annual cycle in southern Brazil. Relative abundance and relative biomass of diatoms showed distinct responses for each river, and the dominant species according to each metric were different. Relative abundance significantly correlated with seven of the eight physical and chemical variables, while relative biomass did not. Both metrics were appointed to the major diatom species of each river, but biomass showed low statistic robustness. The analysis with higher taxonomic rank (families) yielded more coherent outcomes between the metrics. The results showed that diatom relative abundance is effective to relate the composition to environmental conditions; therefore, the abundance should not be neglected in studies of phytoplankton structure and dynamics, mainly when the diatoms are dominant in the community, and the low taxonomic rank ecological indication is regarded.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.