Abstract

Widely used microbial taxonomies, such as the NCBI taxonomy, are based on a combination of sequence homology among conserved genes and historically accepted taxonomies, which were developed based on observable traits such as morphology and physiology. A recently proposed alternative taxonomy database, the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB), incorporates only sequence homology of conserved genes and attempts to partition taxonomic ranks such that each rank implies the same amount of evolutionary distance, regardless of its position on the phylogenetic tree. This provides the first opportunity to completely separate taxonomy from traits and therefore to quantify how taxonomic rank corresponds to traits across the microbial tree of life. We quantified the relative abundances of clusters of orthologous group functional categories (COG-FCs) as a proxy for traits within the lineages of 13,735 cultured and uncultured microbial lineages from a custom-curated genome database. On average, 41.4% of the variation in COG-FC relative abundance is explained by taxonomic rank, with domain, phylum, class, order, family, and genus explaining, on average, 3.2%, 14.6%, 4.1%, 9.2%, 4.8%, and 5.5% of the variance, respectively (P < 0.001 for all). To our knowledge, this is the first work to quantify the variance in metabolic potential contributed by individual taxonomic ranks. A qualitative comparison between the COG-FC relative abundances and genus-level phylogenies, generated from published concatenated protein sequence alignments, further supports the idea that metabolic potential is taxonomically coherent at higher taxonomic ranks. The quantitative analyses presented here characterize the integral relationship between diversification of microbial lineages and the metabolisms which they host.IMPORTANCE Recently, there has been great progress in defining a complete taxonomy of bacteria and archaea, which has been enabled by improvements in DNA sequencing technology and new bioinformatic techniques. A new, algorithmically defined microbial tree of life describes those linkages, relying solely on genetic data, which raises the issue of how microbial traits relate to taxonomy. Here, we adopted cluster of orthologous group functional categories as a scheme to describe the genomic contents of microbes, a method that can be applied to any microbial lineage for which genomes are available. This simple approach allows quantitative comparisons between microbial genomes with different gene compositions from across the microbial tree of life. Our observations demonstrate statistically significant patterns in cluster of orthologous group functional categories at taxonomic levels that span the range from domain to genus.

Highlights

  • The relationship between microbial taxonomy and function is a longstanding problem in microbiology [1,2,3]

  • Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) taxonomy, and associated accessions are provided in Dataset S1, which is explained in more detail in Supplement 3, available here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/rnm6ount2aqkmvn/AACGgZhdrA0fSYnD0mNtIpaxa?dl=0]

  • Most predicted open reading frames for most lineages could be assigned to a clusters of orthologous gene functional categories (COG-FCs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The relationship between microbial taxonomy and function is a longstanding problem in microbiology [1,2,3]. Prior to the identification of the 16S rRNA gene as a taxonomic marker, microbial phylogenetic relationships were defined by traits such as morphology, behavior, and metabolic capacity. Parks et al [5] formalized the genome taxonomy database (GTDB), a phylogeny in which taxonomic ranks are defined by “relative evolutionary divergence” in order to create taxonomic ranks that have uniform evolutionary meaning across the microbial tree of life [5]. This approach removes phenotype or traits entirely from taxonomic assignment. An investigation of the relationship between traits and phylogeny has not been possible until the recent publication of a microbial tree of life that is based solely on evolutionary distance

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call