Abstract
Problem finding (PF) and divergent thinking (DT) are considered to be indicators of creative potential. Previous studies, with different goals, suggest a positive correlation between PF and DT. However, none of these works have explicitly examined which index of DT is more associated with PF. The current investigation examined the association between PF and three main indexes of DT: fluency, flexibility, and originality. It also tested whether such a relation differs based on task nature (verbal vs. figural). The sample consisted of 90 sixth graders who completed three tests: (a) a verbal DT test, (b) a figural DT test, and (c) a PF test. Correlational analysis showed that flexibility was highly correlated with PF in the verbal DT test, whereas originality was significantly correlated with PF in the figural test. Results of the path analysis confirmed the results from correlational analyses and showed that verbal flexibility strongly predicted PF fluency, flexibility, and originality more than any other variable. Likelihood ratio test showed that using 1 or 3% cutoff for scoring originality did not significantly altered the results in both figural and verbal DT (vs. PF), while the likelihood ratio test showed significant differences between the figural and verbal DT. Finally, predictor variables in the verbal DT accounted for 40–58% of the variance in PF skills, whereas predictor variables in the figural DT accounted for 28–37% of the variance in PF skills. As suggested by experts in the field of PF, the role of flexibility in PF is a fertile area to be considered in future studies.
Highlights
The significance of problem finding (PF) is widely recognized, and it is considered the first step in creative problem-solving efforts (e.g., Wallas, 1926; Osborn, 1953; Mumford et al, 1991; Treffinger and Isaksen, 2005)
These study results suggest that the specific divergent thinking (DT) measure and index used can affect the results (Hornberg and Reiter-Palmon, 2017; Reiter-Palmon et al, 2019)
The students were asked to fill out a demographic questionnaire with items on their age and sex. Both the interclass correlation (ICC) and internal consistency reliability were calculated for the three tests that were used in the study
Summary
The significance of problem finding (PF) is widely recognized, and it is considered the first step in creative problem-solving efforts (e.g., Wallas, 1926; Osborn, 1953; Mumford et al, 1991; Treffinger and Isaksen, 2005). Some scholars have even considered PF more important than problem solving (e.g., Einstein and Infeld, 1938; Wertheimer, 1945; Mackworth, 1965; Csikszentmihalyi, 1988). The history of studying PF began with the seminal work of Csikszentmihalyi and Getzels (1971), who aimed to assess PF in art students. The field of creativity research has displayed a growing interest in PF. This important cognitive process has not received as much
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have