Abstract

In one of the editions of the television program Vzgliad [Glance], the following scenario flashed on the screen. A correspondent standing at the entrance to the Institute of the International Workers' Movement, USSR Academy of Sciences, asks ironically: So the is international. But with us, in its own country, aren't we it? Or doesn't it merit our interest? The correspondent naturally knew the answers to these questions (indeed, who does not know them now!). Of course there is a movement, and it must be studied. But another important point also needs to be noted. For several decades, the term labor movement was not used in reference to our society and, in fact, had no currency in political science. Why? After all, the official ideology postulated the leading role of the working class, so should not the idea of a socially oriented of this same advanced class have deserved trust in that context? Evidently it did not. The Stakhanovite movement, to be sure, but a movement. ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.