Abstract

AbstractWhere did words come from? The traditional view is that the relation between the sound of a word and its meaning is arbitrary. An alternative hypothesis, known as sound symbolism, holds that form-meaning correspondence is systematic. Numerous examples of sound symbolism exist across natural language phyla. Moreover, cross-linguistic similarities suggest that sound symbolism represents a language universal. For example, many unrelated languages affix an "ee" sound to words in order to emphasize size distinctions or express affection (e.g., look at the teeny weeny baby); other such phonetic universals are evident for object mass, color, brightness, and aggression. We hypothesize that sound symbolism reflects sensitivity to an ecological law (i.e., Hooke's Law) governing an inverse relation between object mass and acoustic resonance. In two experiments healthy adults showed high agreement in matching pure tones to color swatches and nonwords to novel objects as linear functions of frequency and luminance. These results support a degree of non-arbitrariness in integrating visual and auditory information. We discuss implications for sound symbolism as a factor underlying language evolution.

Highlights

  • Numerous theories exist regarding the genesis of language; there remains no definitive answer to the enduring question of where words came from

  • There exists an alternative hypothesis known as sound symbolism that invokes non-arbitrariness as an account of the ways that cultures assign names to concepts

  • Sound symbolism exists in a variety of other contexts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Numerous theories exist regarding the genesis of language; there remains no definitive answer to the enduring question of where words came from. One psychophysical explanation for sound symbolism in language is that the phenomenon reflects a direct ecological mapping between perceptual information.[11,14] This account, known as the frequency code hypothesis, predicts that humans show sensitivity to non-arbitrariness in the mapping of acoustic to visual information. We do so here, hypothesizing the following: a) Healthy adults are sensitive to a non-arbitrary perceptual relationship between visual and acoustic frequency detail (i.e., Hooke’s Law).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call