Abstract
Tree frogs need to adhere to surfaces of various roughnesses in their natural habitats; these include bark, leaves and rocks. Rough surfaces can alter the effectiveness of their toe pads, due to factors such as a change of real contact area and abrasion of the pad epithelium. Here, we tested the effect of surface roughness on the attachment abilities of the tree frog Litoria caerulea. This was done by testing shear and adhesive forces on artificial surfaces with controlled roughness, both on single toe pads and whole animal scales. It was shown that frogs can stick 2–3 times better on small scale roughnesses (3–6 µm asperities), producing higher adhesive and frictional forces, but relatively poorly on the larger scale roughnesses tested (58.5–562.5 µm asperities). Our experiments suggested that, on such surfaces, the pads secrete insufficient fluid to fill the space under the pad, leaving air pockets that would significantly reduce the Laplace pressure component of capillarity. Therefore, we measured how well the adhesive toe pad would conform to spherical asperities of known sizes using interference reflection microscopy. Based on experiments where the conformation of the pad to individual asperities was examined microscopically, our calculations indicate that the pad epithelium has a low elastic modulus, making it highly deformable.
Highlights
Tree frogs exhibit excellent climbing abilities which allow them to efficiently move through their typically arboreal habitat, doing so using specialised adhesive pads found distally on the ventral surface of each toe
With fine-scale roughness, the volume of fluid produced by the toe pads may be sufficient to completely fill the gaps between the asperities, in which case adhesion will remain good
It is very likely that viscosity-dependant hydrodynamic forces do play a role, as torrent/rock frogs that have toe pads like those of tree frogs [23] can adhere to rough surfaces with their toe pads completely covered in running water [8], a situation where capillary forces would be absent
Summary
Tree frogs exhibit excellent climbing abilities which allow them to efficiently move through their typically arboreal habitat, doing so using specialised adhesive pads found distally on the ventral surface of each toe. Hydrophobic leaves (such as those on lotus leaves [4]), could affect the capillary forces produced by the pad (which require low fluid contact angles), and deprive the pads of adhesive ability. With fine-scale roughness, the volume of fluid produced by the toe pads may be sufficient to completely fill the gaps between the asperities (the ‘flooded‘ regime described by Bhushan [6]), in which case adhesion will remain good. Bhushan’s ‘submerged‘ regime is that of a rock/torrent frog climbing water-covered rock, where the toe pads are completely submerged, abolishing any meniscus [8]. In such cases, capillary forces will be absent, and any adhesion will be likely due to rate-dependent viscous forces
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
