Abstract
ABSTRACTThis article draws on empirical evidence suggesting a shift of credit provision from banks to the alternative investment fund sector to argue that current deficiencies in fund regulation have not prevented such a shift, if not actually encouraged it. The evidence is drawn from the new Pan-European Private Placement Market, and first- and second-order analyses are undertaken to show a shift of credit risk (intermediation) into the hands of US funds in particular, and a concentration of risk amongst herds of smaller funds which have the potential to act as one. The data highlight defects in the scope of the macroprudential oversight mechanisms deriving from the Alternative Investment Fund Management Directive (AIFMD). These findings form the basis for proposals to remedy AIFMD as part of the move to a Capital Markets Union.
Submitted Version (Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.