Abstract
ABSTRACT The spotlight has recently been shone on the statutory duties of directors of companies in financial distress in Australia and New Zealand. In Australia, the 2023 Report on Corporate Insolvency noted concerns about the efficacy of the Australian insolvent trading regime and mooted the possibility of Australia adopting the United Kingdom ‘wrongful trading’ standard. In August 2023 the New Zealand Supreme Court delivered a much-anticipated judgment in Yan v Mainzeal Property and Construction Limited (in liq) focusing on the equivalent reckless trading duties, prompting the question of whether the New Zealand approach may offer useful insights for Australia and the United Kingdom. This paper provides a comparative analysis of the ‘insolvent trading’ provision in Australia, the ‘wrongful trading’ provision in the United Kingdom, and the ‘reckless trading’ provisions in New Zealand, considering these provisions against the backdrop of related statutory provisions and broader policy considerations and objectives.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
