Abstract

In order to hedge efficiently, persistently high negative covariances or, equivalently, correlations, between risky assets and the hedging instruments are intended to mitigate against financial risk and subsequent losses. If there is more than one hedging instrument, multivariate covariances and correlations have to be calculated. As optimal hedge ratios are unlikely to remain constant using high frequency data, it is essential to specify dynamic time-varying models of covariances and correlations. These values can either be determined analytically or numerically on the basis of highly advanced computer simulations. Analytical developments are occasionally promulgated for multivariate conditional volatility models. The primary purpose of this paper is to analyze purported analytical developments for the only multivariate dynamic conditional correlation model to have been developed to date, namely the widely used Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC) model. Dynamic models are not straightforward (or even possible) to translate in terms of the algebraic existence, underlying stochastic processes, specification, mathematical regularity conditions, and asymptotic properties of consistency and asymptotic normality, or the lack thereof. This paper presents a critical analysis, discussion, evaluation, and presentation of caveats relating to the DCC model, with an emphasis on the numerous dos and don’ts in implementing the DCC model, as well as a related model, in practice.

Highlights

  • Hedging financial investments is tantamount to insuring against possible losses arising from risky portfolio allocation

  • The results in the previous section allow a clear discussion of the caveats associated with the widely used Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC) model

  • (6) The DCC model does not satisfy the definition of a conditional correlation matrix, as the purported conditional correlations do not satisfy the definition of a correlation, except by an untenable assumption

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hedging financial investments is tantamount to insuring against possible losses arising from risky portfolio allocation. For the variety of detailed possible outcomes mentioned above, where problematic issues arise constantly and sometimes unexpectedly, a companion paper by the author evaluates the recent developments in modeling dynamic conditional covariances on the basis of the Full BEKK (named for Baba, Engle, Kraft and Kroner) model (see McAleer 2019). Both papers are intended as Topical Collections to bring the known and unknown results pertaining to DCC into a single collection.

Model Specification
Univariate Conditional Volatility Models
Multivariate Conditional Volatility Models
DCC Model
Vector Random Coefficient Moving Average Process
Univariate Process
Multivariate Process
Discussion and Caveats
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call