Abstract

Drawing on the Academic Literacies perspectives of Lea and Street and key genre theorists, this mixed-methods case study explored multilingual student experiences of academic literacy practices in one postgraduate social-science school in an English-medium university in Kazakhstan. Two questions guided the research: (1) To what extent and in what ways do students develop genre knowledge in their school EMI contexts?; (2) Which pedagogical approaches and strategies do students identify as beneficial in supporting genre knowledge development? The study found students developed genre awareness for research-related literacy practices, involving field-, tenor- and mode-related genre knowledge. The study also found student capacity to apply genre knowledge successfully across a range of text genres. Another finding was that challenge and success in genre knowledge development was a function of the extent of explicit feedback from instructors and peers and explicit assignment expectations. Each of our findings are consistent with the critique and recommendations of Lea and Street (1998; 2006) on the importance of a situated approach to developing student academic literacy practice that accounts for the larger institutional contexts and epistemological traditions in which those practices have meaning. These findings have important value for discussions and debates on student academic literacy learning and practice in higher education in Kazakhstan, across Central Asia and in other countries where policies for internationalization and research universities are rapidly transforming higher education literacy practice in the current era of globalization.

Highlights

  • Drawing on the academic literacies perspectives of Lea and Street (1998, 2006) and genre theorists working in systemic functional linguistics (Hasan, 2009; Martin, 2009), this paper describes a mixed-methods case study inquiry into multilingual student experiences of academic literacy practices in one postgraduate social-science school in an English-medium university in Kazakhstan

  • The quantitative surveys and qualitative focus group interviews highlight the important ways students are developing academic genre knowledge and pedagogical approaches and strategies they identify as beneficial in supporting that genre knowledge development

  • We find that genre knowledge development has less to do with surface features of texts, and more with the social environment in which they learn and write

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Drawing on the academic literacies perspectives of Lea and Street (1998, 2006) and genre theorists working in systemic functional linguistics (Hasan, 2009; Martin, 2009), this paper describes a mixed-methods case study inquiry into multilingual student experiences of academic literacy practices in one postgraduate social-science school in an English-medium university in Kazakhstan.As in so many areas of Kazakhstani life since independence in 1991, the higher education system is facing ‘the challenge of moving beyond the Soviet legacy, with all the norms and values embedded in that way of life, and building a uniquely Kazakhstani system of education’ (Hartley and Ruby, 2017, p. 2). As in other Bologna signatory countries (Phillipson, 2006), recent years in Kazakhstan have witnessed a sharp increase in English as a medium of instruction (EMI) in higher education in order to ‘increase competitiveness of students when they leave and position the educational sector as attractive for international students’ (Embassy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, (No date)). Important in this policy context is a national trilingual education policy viewing ‘Kazakh as the national language, Russian as the language of interethnic communication, and English as the language of successful integration in the global economy’ (Nazarbayev, 2007). These changes in policy and practice call for greater student capacity to learn, write and, in the case of PhD students, even publish in English, raising the question of how to develop capacities for English academic literacy in learners and develop capacity for programs to support that literacy

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.