Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are envisioned to enable new abilities of action. This potential can be fruitful in particular when it comes to restoring lost motion or communication abilities or to implementing new possibilities of action. However, BCIs do not come without presuppositions. Applying the concept of ability expectations to BCIs, a wide range of requirements on the side of the users becomes apparent. We examined these ability expectations by taking the example of therapeutic BCI users who got enrolled into BCI research studies due to particular physical conditions. Some of the expectations identified are quite explicit, like particular physical conditions and BCI “literacy”. Other expectations are more implicit, such as motivation, a high level of concentration, pain tolerance, emotion control and resources. These expectations may produce a conception of the human and a self-understanding among BCI users that objectify the body in favour of a brain-centred, cerebral notion of the subject which also plays its part in upholding a normality regime.

Highlights

  • The neurotechnology of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) has established a fast growing and progressing field of research, attached with high hopes and great promises for potential end users as well as researchers

  • We focused on therapeutic BCI users that had been enrolled in BCI studies due to particular physical conditions, mostly degenerative diseases or spinal cord injuries

  • Shifting the focus from what BCIs can bring to the user to what the user must bring to BCI training rendered various requirements that we classified as ability expectations

Read more

Summary

Background

The neurotechnology of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) has established a fast growing and progressing field of research, attached with high hopes and great promises for potential end users as well as researchers. Studies with potential BCI users identified hopes such as improving autonomy [22], “autonomy and empowerment” [23], more independence in terms of mobility, daily life activities and employment [24], and communication opportunities [25, 26]. We focused on therapeutic BCI users that had been enrolled in BCI studies due to particular physical conditions, mostly degenerative diseases or spinal cord injuries. For the case of BCIs, these would be the aforementioned aspects such as more independence or communication opportunities The latter are ability expectations regarding what the technology requires from the user. It asks for what—skills, competences, attitudes, and resources—is expected from the user in order to operate the technology successfully These ability expectations from the user are what we want to look at in this study

Participants
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call