Abstract

There are various studies on mental health literacy which examine lay people’s knowledge and understanding of various mental disorders. Many are interested in beliefs about cause, manifestation and cure as well as the relationship between those beliefs. This study examines lay beliefs regarding the manifestations, aetiology and treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), and their determinants using a questionnaire divided into three parts. Participants (N = 201) answered 45 attitudinal statements designed for this study regarding NPD. They consisted of 18 manifestation items, 15 aetiology items and 12 treatment items referring to NPD. They also completed the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Each section of the questionnaire was factor analysed to determine the structure of those beliefs. Factors derived from a principle component analysis of lay beliefs demonstrate poor knowledge of NPD. Factors derived from the manifestations, aetiology and treatment section were modestly and coherently correlated. No demographic factors correlated with all aspects of mental health literacy and lay theories. People are surprisingly misinformed about NPD. They believed that narcissists manifested superficiality and social problems, business abilities and fragility. No distinction was made between biological and psychological causes or genetics and early negative events. Inability to identify NPD may account for many reports of sub-clinical narcissism being associated with leadership derailment.

Highlights

  • The present study concerns lay people’s beliefs about narcissism

  • Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is found in cluster B of the personality disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-R, there have been few empirical studies investigating whether the DSM criteria are useful in defining NPD as the DSM criteria are based on clinical anecdotes rather than empirical studies (Cooper & Ronningstam, 1992)

  • This study aims to investigate laypeople’s beliefs regarding the manifestations, aetiology and treatment of NPD using three exploratory principle component analyses on attitudinal statements specific to NPD to determine whether laypeople’s beliefs can be reduced into interpretable factors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The present study concerns lay people’s beliefs about narcissism. It is surprising that despite the prevalence ofHow to cite this paper: Wright, K., & Furnham, A. (2014). How to cite this paper: Wright, K., & Furnham, A. Furnham personality disorders and a rise of narcissism in Western culture (Lasch, 1978) that little research has been carried out into lay theories of NPD. This may be due, in part, to difficulties defining NPD. NPD is found in cluster B of the personality disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-R, there have been few empirical studies investigating whether the DSM criteria are useful in defining NPD as the DSM criteria are based on clinical anecdotes rather than empirical studies (Cooper & Ronningstam, 1992). NPD is found in cluster B of the personality disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-R, there have been few empirical studies investigating whether the DSM criteria are useful in defining NPD as the DSM criteria are based on clinical anecdotes rather than empirical studies (Cooper & Ronningstam, 1992). Pincus and Lukowitsky (2010) concluded that relying on DSM-IV criteria may impede the recognition of clinical narcissists

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call