Abstract
Traditionally hypnosis has been viewed as an altered state of consciousness or trance, perhaps similar to sleep. However, recently a number of psychologists have questioned this view. Non-state theorists have argued that hypnosis can be adequately explained in terms of more ordinary psychological processes such as role enactment, imagination, relaxation, compliance, obedience, attention, distraction, and attitudes and expectations, without the necessity of invoking the concept of a special state. Research in hypnosis on topics such as physiological responses, strength and endurance, memory enhancement and amnesia, and clinical phenomena including analgesia suggests that, in general, most phenomena attributed to hypnosis can be accomplished by 'unhypnotised' individuals, so long as they are appropriately motivated and instructed. Consequently, although a number of issues remain unresolved, there is a strong case for arguing that much of the special status that has been awarded to hypnosis may have resulted from a failure to consider the power of social pressures and the normal capacities of ordinary human beings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.