Abstract
BackgroundDecreasing hospital length of stay, and so freeing up hospital beds, represents an important cost saving which is often used in economic evaluations. The savings need to be accurately quantified in order to make optimal health care resource allocation decisions. Traditionally the accounting cost of a bed is used. We argue instead that the economic cost of a bed day is the better value for making resource decisions, and we describe our valuation method and estimations for costing this important resource.MethodsWe performed a contingent valuation using 37 Australian Chief Executive Officers’ (CEOs) willingness to pay (WTP) to release bed days in their hospitals, both generally and using specific cases. We provide a succinct thematic analysis from qualitative interviews post survey completion, which provide insight into the decision making process.ResultsOn average CEOs are willing to pay a marginal rate of $216 for a ward bed day and $436 for an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) bed day, with estimates of uncertainty being greater for ICU beds. These estimates are significantly lower (four times for ward beds and seven times for ICU beds) than the traditional accounting costs often used. Key themes to emerge from the interviews include the importance of national funding and targets, and their associated incentive structures, as well as the aversion to discuss bed days as an economic resource.ConclusionsThis study highlights the importance for valuing bed days as an economic resource to inform cost effectiveness models and thus improve hospital decision making and resource allocation. Significantly under or over valuing the resource is very likely to result in sub-optimal decision making. We discuss the importance of recognising the opportunity costs of this resource and highlight areas for future research.
Highlights
Decreasing hospital length of stay, and so freeing up hospital beds, represents an important cost saving which is often used in economic evaluations
Holding all factors constant (Section 1 of survey) we found that on average Chief Executive Officers’ (CEOs) were willing to pay AU$193,000 per annum (
There were missing data for two hospitals. We stress that these willingness to pay (WTP) estimates do not represent the actual amounts that hospitals paid for the beds in terms of accounting costs but rather the CEOs judgment about how much they would be willing to pay to release this quantity of beds
Summary
Decreasing hospital length of stay, and so freeing up hospital beds, represents an important cost saving which is often used in economic evaluations. Decreasing length of stay and freeing up, or releasing of hospital beds, represents a cost saving. The second value, the economic cost, is the real value we “should” be interested in. This is because the majority of bed costs are fixed and sunk costs, and the “true” value of releasing a hospital bed is better captured by the extent to which it allows one to achieve other outcomes that the hospital desires, such as treat another patient, reduce waiting lists, and meet economic targets.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have