Abstract
What has Science’s open-access sting taught us about the quality of peer review?
Highlights
MIĆO TATALOVIĆ: WHAT HAS SCIENCE'S OPEN ACCESS STING TAUGHT US ABOUT THE QUALITY OF PEER REVIEW?
Were listed in Directory of Open Access Journals, and some, tellingly, in Beall's List of predatory publishers. This left out thousands of journals that publish in local languages, including many in our region of South-East Europe
Croatia alone, has academic journals listed on the central portal of Croatian scientific journals - Hrčak [ ]. Most of these are open access and funded by the government, yet scientists often criticise many of them for being a waste of public money and dumps for bad science that cannot be published in better international journals [ ]
Summary
MIĆO TATALOVIĆ: WHAT HAS SCIENCE'S OPEN ACCESS STING TAUGHT US ABOUT THE QUALITY OF PEER REVIEW?. Most of these are open access and funded by the government, yet scientists often criticise many of them for being a waste of public money and dumps for bad science that cannot be published in better international journals [ ].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
