Abstract

A novel but simple approach for describing stand structure in natural and managed forests driven by small-scaled disturbances is introduced. A primeval beech forest reserve in Slovakia and two beech stands in Germany with different management histories were studied, and their forest stand texture was analysed in terms of tree coordinates, stem diameter, and crown radius. Neigh-bouring trees of similar size with estimated contact of their crowns were assigned to tree groups. The study goal was to estimate the number and size of such homogeneous patches. In all cases, the number of tree groups in a particular diameter class decreased exponentially as group size increased. Single trees were predominant. Compared to simulated random tree distributions, the natural stand exhibited a more clumped distribution of small trees and more regular distribution of larger ones. The natural forest generally had smaller groups than the managed even aged stand, but the smallest group sizes were found in the uneven-aged selection forest. The simple analytical approach provided new spatial insights into neighbourhood relations of trees. The continuous scale from single trees to larger tree groups is an important achievement compared to other analytical methods applied in this field. The findings may even indicate a certain degree of self-organization in natural forests. Due to the limitations associated with each method or statistical models, a joint consideration of 1) gap dynamics, 2) forest developmental stages, and 3) size classes of homogeneous tree groups is recommended. Relevant to forest practitioners, the size class distributions enhance an understanding of the complex stand structures in natural forests and therewith support an emulation of natural forest dynamics in managed beech forests.

Highlights

  • IntroductionLight and microclimate influence various processes in beech forest ecosystems, affecting their regeneration performance and growth of individual trees (Madsen & Larson, 1997; Wagner, 1999; Bartsch et al, 2002; Pretzsch, 2009)

  • Close-to-Nature Forest Management” (CNFM) is widely used in Central Europe and can be implemented in conjunction with a wide range of silvicultural methods focusing on single trees and tree groups (Duncker et al, 2012; Brang et al, 2014; Bauhus et al, 2014)

  • We provide a method for describing complex stand structures that may result from close-to-nature forest management which aims to simulate natural forest processes, to emulate natural disturbances and to increase structural diversity (Otto, 1994; Larsen, 2012)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Light and microclimate influence various processes in beech forest ecosystems, affecting their regeneration performance and growth of individual trees (Madsen & Larson, 1997; Wagner, 1999; Bartsch et al, 2002; Pretzsch, 2009). These processes are influenced by other factors such as stand structure. Because natural stand structures provide certain advantages in terms of resilience and genetic adaptability, they are increasingly regarded as a viable option for the management of beech stands (Finkeldey & Ziehe, 2004; Röhrig et al, 2006; Brumme & Khanna, 2009). It is impossible to perfectly reproduce natural forest structures in a managed stand since by definition, natural forest is not managed (Leibundgut, 1993)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.