Abstract

Based on the question of “what happened to the king has his daughter sent for”, this paper aims to get a contrastive analysis of English periphrastic causative construction of [X HAVE Y Vpp] from different perspectives including Langacker’s action chain theory, Dixon’s nine semantic parameters ' framework, Talmy’s causal-chain windowing analysis and Wolff’s force theory. The research results show that 1) Dixon’s semantic parameters’ framework could provide much detailed information in the causative situation, yet most of the “Yes/No” question to correspond each semantic parameters could not solve all the problems such as the transitivity, the control of the causee, etc. 2) Both Langacker’s action chain theory and Talmy’s causal-chain windowing analysis seem a little similar, yet the latter one could supply with more information. 3) In Langacker’s description of action chain in causative construction: there is also a slight change in adding the link not only at the beginning of action chain, but also in the middle of the action chain. 4) Wolff’s force theory is quite flexible with different concrete directions of all possibly included parameters, yet it might be better if adding some information form Dixon’s semantic parameters.

Highlights

  • In this study the causation would be narrowed down and concentrated only in the area of linguistic representation especially in the domain of English periphrastic causative construction in linguistic representation such as [X HAVE Y Vpp], for example, did you have the blades sharpened? Here in this paper, the instance chosen from Talmy (2000: p. 474), “The king had his daughter sent for”, would be concentrated and analyzed from different perspectives of linguistic theories

  • 1) What are the main idea of those selected theories—Langacker’s action chain, Dixon’s semantic parameters, Talmy’s causal-chain windowing and Wolff’s Force theory? To what extent they could solve the problem of illustrating the example of “The King has his Daughter Sent for”?

  • We find that Talmy’s causal-chain windowing seems similar to Langacker’s action chain theory, yet with more detailed information about illustrating the example

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The causation we live by has been explored synchronously and diachronically in a quite large number of areas from many different perspectives. We can take a brief literature review of English periphrastic causative constructions of this paper. 340) has pointed out “the importance causation to the underlying structure of human language”, he gives “a general analysis of linguistic expression of causation in English with special attention to periphrastic causative constructions”. Dixon (2000) defines the classification of causation much more widely than Song’s from the perspective of semantic parameters, according to which there are two major types of causative constructions—synthetic (such as morphological, zero-marked and compound causatives) and analytic (such as permissive, periphrastic and isolating).

Research Questions
A Multi-Perspective Approach to “The King Has His Daughter Sent for”
Langackger’s Action Chain to “The King Has His Daughter Sent for”
Dixon’s Semantic Parameters to “The King Has His Daughter Sent for”
Talmy’s Causal-Chain Windowing to “The King Has His Daughter Sent for”
Wolff’s Force Theory to “The King Has His Daughter Sent for”
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call