WE‐H‐207A‐07: Image‐Based Versus Atlas‐Based Internal Dosimetry

Abstract

Purpose:Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is known as the gold standard method for internal dosimetry. It requires radionuclide distribution from PET or SPECT and body structure from CT for accurate dose calculation. The manual or semi‐automatic segmentation of organs from CT images is a major obstacle. The aim of this study is to compare the dosimetry results based on patient's own CT and a digital humanoid phantom as an atlas with pre‐specified organs.Methods:SPECT‐CT images of a 50 year old woman who underwent bone pain palliation with Samarium‐153 EDTMP for osseous metastases from breast cancer were used. The anatomical date and attenuation map were extracted from SPECT/CT and three XCAT digital phantoms with different BMIs (i.e. matched (38.8) and unmatched (35.5 and 36.7) with patient's BMI that was 38.3). Segmentation of patient's organs in CT image was performed using itk‐SNAP software. GATE MC Simulator was used for dose calculation. Specific absorbed fractions (SAFs) and S‐values were calculated for the segmented organs.Results:The differences between SAFs and S‐values are high using different anatomical data and range from −13% to 39% for SAF values and −109% to 79% for S‐values in different organs. In the spine, the clinically important target organ for Samarium Therapy, the differences in the S‐values and SAF values are higher between XCAT phantom and CT when the phantom with identical BMI is employed (53.8% relative difference in S‐value and 26.8% difference in SAF). However, the whole body dose values were the same between the calculations based on the CT and XCAT with different BMIs.Conclusion:The results indicated that atlas‐based dosimetry using XCAT phantom even with matched BMI for patient leads to considerable errors as compared to image‐based dosimetry that uses the patient's own CT Patient‐specific dosimetry using CT image is essential for accurate results.