Weathering crust and cryoconite holes on the Hells Gate and Nansen Ice Shelves (East Antarctica)

Abstract

The penetration of shortwave radiation at the surface of an ice shelf has the potential to induce internal melting, resulting in the formation of a porous layer close to the surface commonly known as the weathering crust. This dynamic hydrological system is known to host light-absorbing impurities and microbes, forming a highly porous layer at the ice sheet's surface. The presence of the weathering crust significantly impacts the overall volume of generated meltwater by modulating the extent to which shortwave radiation is absorbed or reflected by the ice. Beyond external meteorological forcing, local conditions leading to weathering crust formation can be influenced by biological impurities on ice surfaces. This interplay between surface ice structures, cryoconite holes (CHs) and weathering crust contributes to the spatial and temporal variability of albedo and surface melt. In this study, we analysed uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) data and ground-based field spectroscopy data collected during the 2022/23 austral summer in Antarctica. The aim is to map CHs spatial distribution and to evaluate their radiative impact on blue ice fields at the Hells Gate Ice Shelf in Northern Victoria Land (East Antarctica). Furthermore, we documented the formation of the weathering crust and supraglacial ponds at Hells Gate and Nansen Ice Shelves across the summer solstice. By analysing Sentinel-2 satellite data, we were able to determine the spatial variability in surface albedo before and after the formation of the weathering crust. In detail, at the Hells Gate Ice Shelf, we estimated < 1% of area covered by CHs. Over frozen ponds and ice bands the area covered in CHs reached almost 10%. The corresponding spatially integrated-radiative forcing resulted to be about 1 Wm-2 in average, but locally it reached values of over 200 Wm-2, thus sustaining liquid water inside the CHs. As for the weathering crust, the delta albedo (Δα) was found to be about +0.10 and +0.40 respectively where weathering crust covered blue and marine ice. On the other hand, the supraglacial pond and stream formation provided an opposite Δα of about -0.30 over blue ice and -0.50 over areas previously characterised by snow cover. However, the fractional area interested by positive Δα resulted to be significantly higher than positive Δα areas over the two ice shelves.