Abstract
Weak $B^-\rightarrow D^0, \pi^0$ and $D^-\rightarrow {K}^0, \pi^0$ transition form factors are described in both the space- and time-like momentum transfer regions, within a constituent-quark model. Neutrino-meson scattering and semileptonic weak decays are formulated within the point form of relativistic quantum mechanics to end up with relativistic invariant process amplitudes from which meson transition currents and form factors are extracted in an unambiguous way. For space-like momentum transfers, form factors depend on the frame in which the $W M M^\prime$ vertex is considered. Such a frame dependence is expected from a pure valence-quark picture, since a complete, frame independent description of form factors is supposed to include non-valence contributions. The most important of such contributions are the $Z$-graphs, which are, however, suppressed in the infinite-momentum frame ($q^2<0$). On the other hand, they can play a significant role in the Breit frame ($q^2<0$) and in the direct decay calculation ($q^2>0$), as a comparison with the infinite-momentum-frame form factors (analytically continued to $q^2>0$) reveals. Numerical results for the analytically continued infinite-momentum-frame form factors agree very well with lattice data in the time-like momentum transfer region and the experimental value for the slope of the $F^+_{B\rightarrow D}$ transition form factor at zero recoil is reproduced satisfactorily. These predictions satisfy heavy-quark-symmetry constraints and their $q^2$ dependence is well approximated by a pole fit, reminiscent of a vector-meson-dominance-like decay mechanism. We discuss how such a decay mechanism can be accommodated within an extension of our constituent-quark model, by allowing for a non-valence component in the meson wave functions. We also address the question of wrong cluster properties inherent in the Bakamjian-Thomas formulation.
Highlights
We have investigated weak B → D; π and D → K; π transition form factors for space- and timelike momentum transfers, as can be measured in neutrino scattering and semileptonic weak decays
We have used the point form of relativistic quantum mechanics in connection with the Bakamjian-Thomas construction to describe these systems in a relativistic invariant way by means of a constituent-quark model
The same observation was already made in previous work on electromagnetic form factors [1,10,11], where it was suspected that the origin of this s dependence are wrong clusterseparability properties inherent in the Bakamjian-Thomas construction
Summary
This paper continues previous work in which semileptonic weak B → D; π and D → K; π decays [1–4] have been investigated within a constituent-quark model making use. These analyses make use of front-form dynamics, and the main conclusion is that the construction of a frame independent covariant meson (transition) current requires the inclusion of the, so-called, “Z-graph” contribution In a constituent-quark model, the direct diagram (a) corresponds to the usual valence-quark contribution, whereas the other diagrams, in particular the Z graph
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Transition Form Factors
Form Of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
Form Factors
Time-like Momentum Transfer
Constituent-quark Model
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Physical Review D
Mar 1, 1996
Few-Body Systems
Aug 1, 2014
Physical Review D
Sep 17, 2012
Physical Review D
Apr 3, 2012
arXiv: High Energy Physics - Lattice
Jun 22, 2009
Physical Review D
Mar 1, 1997
Suplemento de la Revista Mexicana de Física
Aug 1, 2022
Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements
Apr 1, 2012
arXiv: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Oct 16, 2019
Nuclear Physics B
Nov 1, 2021
Physical Review D
Oct 1, 1997
arXiv: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Sep 14, 1999
Physical Review C
Jun 25, 2007
Physics Letters B
Sep 1, 1996
Physical Review D
Oct 13, 2011
Physical Review D
Physical Review D
Nov 22, 2023
Physical Review D
Nov 22, 2023
Physical Review D
Nov 22, 2023
Physical Review D
Nov 22, 2023
Physical Review D
Nov 22, 2023
Physical Review D
Nov 22, 2023
Physical Review D
Nov 22, 2023
Physical Review D
Nov 22, 2023
Physical Review D
Nov 22, 2023
Physical Review D
Nov 22, 2023