Abstract

BackgroundThe present observational data from the fetal medicine unit aim to identify gaps in prenatal screening modalities employed in the primary obstetric care population in coastal Karnataka.MethodsA retrospective observational study of all referrals to Fetal Medicine unit is over 2 years. For each fetal abnormality, we reviewed the literature to note the range of gestational age at which the abnormality should almost always be diagnosed. Taking this as standard, the gestational age at which each of these problems was diagnosed and referred was noted down. They were compared and analysed to understand the efficiency of prenatal screening practices in the referral population. The final perinatal outcome was also noted down in order to assess the impact on perinatal mortality/morbidity.ResultsA total of 277 cases were referred to fetal medicine unit. Two hundred twenty-eight cases (82.31%) were low risk pregnancies. Among 277 cases, 200 (72.2%) had structural abnormalities, 7 (2.5%) chromosomal/ genetic abnormalities, 61 (22.02%) isolated soft markers, and 9 (3.2%) twin-related problems. Detection rate of structural abnormalities was 33% at 14 weeks and 52.22% at 20 weeks, considering those anomalies usually diagnosed by these gestational age windows. The primary reason for delayed diagnosis was non-performance of ultrasound “on time”, rather than missed diagnosis. Fifty-three per cent (106 out of 200) of all the fetal structural abnormalities were diagnosed beyond 20 weeks. Average gestational age at mid-trimester anomaly scan in this group was between 20 and 24 weeks. Sixty-one patients were referred due to isolated soft markers, 30 beyond 20 weeks. Eighty per cent of them did not have any aneuploidy screening in pregnancy.ConclusionPractice of fetal medicine hugely depends upon appropriate prenatal screening practices in the referral population. There is an urgent need to bring in standard protocols for Prenatal Screening across all the primary obstetric care providers, both in the public and private sectors. Considering the huge burden of delayed prenatal diagnosis in our country, the proposed revision of MTP bill is a welcome change in fast-growing field of fetal diagnosis and therapy.

Highlights

  • Pregnancy outcome heavily depends upon the timely diagnosis and referral from the primary obstetric caregiver

  • We performed a retrospective review of our Fetal Medicine Referrals over the last 2 years, looking for a representative data on prenatal screening practices at primary obstetric care in the referral population

  • Twenty weeks was taken as an important GA parameter for referral in this study, this being legal upper limit of Medical termination of Pregnancy (MTP) in India

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pregnancy outcome heavily depends upon the timely diagnosis and referral from the primary obstetric caregiver. We performed a retrospective review of our Fetal Medicine Referrals over the last 2 years, looking for a representative data on prenatal screening practices at primary obstetric care in the referral population. The present observational data from the fetal medicine unit aim to identify gaps in prenatal screening modalities employed in the primary obstetric care population in coastal Karnataka. We reviewed the literature to note the range of gestational age at which the abnormality should almost always be diagnosed. The gestational age at which each of these problems was diagnosed and referred was noted down They were compared and analysed to understand the efficiency of prenatal screening practices in the referral population. Considering the huge burden of delayed prenatal diagnosis in our country, the proposed revision of MTP bill is a welcome change in fast-growing field of fetal diagnosis and therapy

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call