Abstract

Editing Wikipedia is probably the best way for historians of science to spend their working hours. I became an historian of science because the history (and philosophy and sociology) of science (and medicine and technology) touches on virtually every important social and political issue in the modern world. I wanted to help put the field where it ought to be, at the center of any program of liberal and/or scientific education—part of the baseline of cultural literacy. When I entered grad school, it was a great letdown to realize just how small a part of academic life involves reaching beyond the walls of academe. Public service is not part of the scholar social role until one reaches full professor, if ever. But while my original motivation to edit Wikipedia was an impulse toward service (along with the desire for an audience), that is not primarily why it is incumbent upon scholars in the history of science and her sister fields to join me...

Highlights

  • Editing Wikipedia is probably the best way for historians of science to spend their working hours

  • While my original motivation to edit Wikipedia was an impulse toward service, that is not primarily why it is incumbent upon scholars in the history of science and her sister fields to join me

  • Countless surfers have experienced the problem with Wikipedia; an afternoon's intellectual journey that begins with Canada may end with the history of abortion, the history of biotechnology, the Manhattan Project, or philosophy of science

Read more

Summary

Sage Ross*

Editing Wikipedia is probably the best way for historians of science to spend their working hours. Public service is not part of the scholar social role until one reaches full professor, if ever. While my original motivation to edit Wikipedia was an impulse toward service (along with the desire for an audience), that is not primarily why it is incumbent upon scholars in the history of science and her sister fields to join me. (Spontaneous Generations, only the second open access history and philosophy of science journal so far as I know, is an overdue step in the right direction.) Our field in particular has plenty of mind share to gain; so much of what we do is highly relevant to, yet under‐read by, other humanists. History departments may even begin to realize the pressing need for an additional

Spontaneous Generations
SAGE ROSS Yale University
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call