WATERFALL MODEL OVER PCD.UCT MODEL REVIEW

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Abstract. The software development life cycle (SDLC) has seen the evolution of numerous models, each tailored to meet specific project needs. Among these, the Waterfall Model has been a longstanding, traditional approach, characterized by its linear and sequential phases. In contrast, the PcD.UcT Model, a relatively newer framework, advocates for a more iterative and user-centered approach. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the Waterfall Model, evaluating its strengths and limitations in modern software development. It contrasts these findings with the PcD.UcT Model, analyzing how its principles better align with contemporary project demands, particularly in terms of flexibility, user engagement, and iterative refinement. Through this comparative analysis, the paper aims to provide insights into the applicability and effectiveness of each model, offering guidance for software development teams in choosing the appropriate methodology for their projects. Since the waterfall development methodology, the key requirements in system development strategies have shifted from processes to users. Because the process as well as the customers are both equally important, employing either a predictive or an adaptive methodology is extremely difficult. The primary goal of this work is mainly combining and then evaluating all the relevant methodologies in order to create a HydroGIS that accurately automates the complexities of the hydrology process in a HydroGIS environment while meeting all user requirements.