Abstract

Warming temperatures are greatly impacting wild organisms across the globe. Some of the negative impacts of climate change can be mitigated behaviorally, for example, by changes in habitat and oviposition site choice. Temperatures are reportedly warming faster at night than during the day, yet studies assessing the impacts of increasing night temperature are rare. We used the Finnish Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia) as study species and exposed adult butterflies of both sexes to warmer night conditions. Under a seminatural outdoor enclosure, we assessed whether females base their oviposition choices primarily on habitat site characteristics (open, suggestive of dry meadows, versus covered by a coarse canopy, suggestive of pastures) or on plant condition (dry vs. lush), and if their choice is altered by the thermal conditions experienced at night. As exposure to warmer environmental conditions is expected to increase resting metabolic rate and potentially reduce life expectancy, we further assessed the fitness implications of warm‐night temperatures. We found that females prefer open sites for oviposition and that females do not switch their oviposition strategy based on the thermal conditions they experienced at night prior to the reproductive event. Exposure to warm nights did not influence female lifespan, but the egg hatching success of their offspring was reduced. In addition, we found that males exposed to warm nights sired larger clutches with higher hatching rate. As warm‐night exposure reduced male lifespan, this may imply a switch in male resource allocation strategy toward increased offspring quality. The present work adds on to the complex implications of climate warming and highlights the importance of the often‐neglected role of males in shaping offspring performance.

Highlights

  • Climate change is gradually increasing the average global temperature (Van Vuuren et al, 2008), and it has been estimated that temperatures are warming faster at night than during daytime (Cox et al, 2020)

  • Some examples of the negative impacts of climate change include the alteration in the occurrence of sexually selected features (Spottiswoode et al, 2006), sex ratio shifts in species where sex is determined thermally (Santidrián Tomillo et al, 2015), the modification of the timing of foraging and breeding of migratory species (Møller et al, 2008), and phenological mismatches between interacting species (Menzel et al, 2006; Ovaskainen et al, 2013; Walther, 2010)

  • The impacts of rising night temperature on life history responses and their potential behavioral implications have been largely neglected in research

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Climate change is gradually increasing the average global temperature (Van Vuuren et al, 2008), and it has been estimated that temperatures are warming faster at night than during daytime (Cox et al, 2020). In ectothermic organisms, rising temperatures are expected to increase metabolic rate (Dillon et al, 2010) and accelerate the pace of life, causing a shorter lifespan or an earlier death (Pearl, 1928) This is expected to alter the timing of reproductive efforts and shift resource allocation from future to current reproduction (reviewed in Metcalfe & Monaghan, 2001). We expected changes in resource allocation strategies as a consequence of potentially increased metabolic rate resulting in accelerated pace of life under warmer night conditions. We addressed the role of both sexes, as often times the impact of paternal contribution to offspring fitness is neglected

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call