Abstract
"Walter Brueggemann’s Trial Metaphor Model – In the Light of Some Critiques. Walter Brueggemann’s Theology of the Old Testament evoked a lot of criticism. His trial metaphor as a methodological frame is generally welcomed. But we recognize that the courtroom situation presented in Brueggemann’s way can be seen as a hermeneutical model for referentiality, that is to say: when we do not have any empirically verifiable evidence about God, the only chance for us is to accept the testimony of the biblical text. The rhetoric of the accepted testimony will constitute the reality after this. This opinion of Brueggemann is sharply criticized by many scholars. The present essay tries to answer ‒ in a modest way ‒ some of these judgments and concludes that the reality generated by the testimony can be known and understood better if its rhetoric is primarily analysed through literary study. Keywords: Walter Brueggemann, Old Testament theology, trial/courtroom metaphor, testimony, rhetoric, referentiality, literary study "
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.