Abstract

Objective. To determine how the features, conditions, and maintenance of a low-income park affect the use of the park for physical activity during the winter months. Method. Direct observation of park use; assessment of park quality based on a developed assessment tool; and supplementary surveys with park users. Results. The park lacked winter park features (e.g. ice rink, tobogganing hill) and supporting amenities (e.g. washrooms, rental facilities). There was evidence of winter maintenance, however, it was inconsistent: most trails were cleared of snow on all visits, but large ice patches were present and had not been cleared. The park was used primarily for walking and dog walking, although respondents noted that the lack of maintenance in the park affected if they used it for physical activity. Conclusion. Winter maintenance of parks and the presence of winter features affect park use, with snow removal, ice removal, and the presence of bathrooms having a strong influence on physical activity levels in the winter months. Park planners should consider year-round maintenance and programming in order to promote engagement in physical activity during all seasons.

Highlights

  • The park lacked winter park features and supporting amenities

  • Winter maintenance of parks and the presence of winter features affect park use, with snow removal, ice removal, and the presence of bathrooms having a strong influence on physical activity levels in the winter months

  • In keeping with the trends of the 1980s, a scarce number of recent studies reviewed for the purpose of this study explored the conditions and/or winter-specific features of park space, and how these affect park use during the winter months

Read more

Summary

Results

The park lacked winter park features (e.g. ice rink, tobogganing hill) and supporting amenities (e.g. washrooms, rental facilities). There was evidence of winter maintenance, it was inconsistent: most trails were cleared of snow on all visits, but large ice patches were present and had not been cleared. The park was used primarily for walking and dog walking, respondents noted that the lack of maintenance in the park affected if they used it for physical activity

Conclusion
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Literature Review
Gaps in the Literature
Winter and Public Space
Site Location & Neighbourhood Context
Limitations of Methodology
Chapter 4: Results & Discussion
Park Quality & Programming
Features
Amenities
Winter Maintenance
Park Use
Smythe Park Recommendations What the assessment of Smythe
City of Toronto
IceSkatePark – Mississauga, Ontario
Chapter 6: Conclusion & Future Research
20. Are you Male Female
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call