Abstract
Elliott Rudwick’s 1957 examination of the methodology and sociological significance of the Atlanta Sociological Laboratory served as the singular treatise on this topic for nearly fifty years. This query departs from Rudwick’s publication through its critique of the Atlanta Sociological Laboratory beyond a conceptual frame that compares the school’s methodological techniques with advancements in the discipline at a later period in time, but, instead, challenges Rudwick’s conclusion that the methodology was unsophisticated and of low quality and that the sociological significance was, at best, minimal.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
