Vulnerability to harvest by anglers differs across climate, productivity, and diversity clines

Abstract

We contrast catchability of walleye (Sander vitreus) and northern pike (Esox lucius) populations with angling fisheries across regions that differ twofold in growing-degree-days and productivity and sixfold in fish diversity. Populations of both species in Alberta, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Oneida Lake, New York, had density-dependent catchability with approximately tenfold higher catchability in Alberta than in the other regions when density was controlled for. There is no evidence that the higher catchability estimates for Alberta walleye and northern pike are due to differential spatial distributions, enhanced hook avoidance due to catch and release or to differential size structure of the populations, or to differences in harvest regulations. We argue that the most likely explanation for the tenfold higher catchability is increased hunger resulting in enhanced foraging activity in the region with a substantially shorter growing season, lower prey productivity, and lower prey community diversity. Regardless of the proximate causes, higher catchability of fish harvested in recreational fisheries in Alberta substantially increases their vulnerability to overharvest and collapse if angling effort is unabated.