Voriconazole Versus Amphotericin B as Induction Therapy for Talaromycosis in HIV/AIDS Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Abstract

Disseminated talaromycosis caused by Talaromyces marneffei is a life-threatening opportunistic infection. Although amphotericin B deoxycholate (dAmB) remains the first-line induction treatment, voriconazole can also be used. However, no clinical trials have compared dAmB and voriconazole in the administration of talaromycosis. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of voriconazole or dAmB as induction therapy for talaromycosis in HIV-infected patients. We enrolled HIV-infected patients with a confirmed Talaromyces marneffei infection who received intravenous dAmB (0.6 to 0.7mg/kg daily for 2weeks) or voriconazole (6mg/kg every 12h on day 1 and 4mg/kg every 12h afterward) as induction therapy, followed by oral itraconazole as consolidation and maintenance therapy. Drug efficacy was evaluated based on response rate. Drug safety was evaluated based on the occurrence of adverse events. In total, 58 patients who received voriconazole and 82 who received dAmB were enrolled from two hospitals. The voriconazole and dAmB treatment groups had similar response rates at the primary and follow-up efficacy evaluations. However, the durations of induction antifungal therapy and hospital stay were shorter for patients in the voriconazole group than in the dAmB group. Few adverse reactions occurred in either the voriconazole or dAmB group. Our retrospective study indicated that voriconazole is an effective and safe induction antifungal drug for HIV-associated disseminated talaromycosis. The duration of induction treatment with voriconazole was shorter, indicating its potential as a better choice in clinical practice. The duration of voriconazole induction therapy is 11 to 13days.