Abstract
The voluntary non-monetary approach to conservation refers to actions that citizens or organizations could voluntarily implement in their area of influence without the incentive of monetary compensations. To be effectively implemented by untrained actors, actions should be clearly defined, straightforward to implement and not require specific scientific knowledge. The costs of actions should also be sufficiently affordable to be widely applied without monetary incentives. A voluntary non-monetary approach has so far not been clearly described as a distinct group of tools for nature conservation. Here we review the scarce scientific literature on the topic. To illustrate the applicability of a voluntary non-monetary approach to conservation, we then investigate its potential for farmland conservation. We considered a list of 119 actions available from “conservation-evidence”, a source of systematically collected evidence on effectiveness of conservation actions. Among 119 actions, 95 could be scored for feasibility of implementation, costs, and existence of evidence in UK, Spain and Finland. Sixteen to seventeen actions were potentially suitable for implementation by a voluntary non-monetary approach. This implies that the voluntary non-monetary approach could be widely applicable across many countries and environments. It is our hope that this study will represent a clarion call for conservation scientists to clearly recognize the voluntary non-monetary approach, its characteristics, and its potential for addressing conservation issues on private land. Adoption of such voluntary measures may be more dependent on encouragement (‘nudging’) than on the usual coercive or financial emphasis (‘shoving’).
Highlights
While protected areas remain the most recognized tool used for biodiversity conservation, their extent does not guarantee the future persistence of global biodiversity (Pressey 1994; Watson et al, 2014)
We review the scientific literature for studies where a voluntary non-monetary approach to biodiversity conservation has been applied on private land
From the systematic literature searches described above as well as from detected documents in the grey literature, we identified a number of cases where a voluntary non-monetary approach has been used for nature conservation
Summary
While protected areas remain the most recognized tool used for biodiversity conservation, their extent (currently around 13% of global terrestrial land) does not guarantee the future persistence of global biodiversity (Pressey 1994; Watson et al, 2014). We review the scientific literature for studies where a voluntary non-monetary approach to biodiversity conservation has been applied on private land. Voluntary approaches for nature conservation on private land have typically been treated as a single group, including both market-based and non-monetary means.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.