Abstract

The objective of this study was to test whether or not soft tissue augmentation with a volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX) leads to similar volume gain around dental implants compared to autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG). In 12 adult beagle dogs, immediate implants were placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration. After 25-45weeks, soft tissue augmentation was randomly performed using VCMX, SCTG, or a sham-operated control. Impressions were taken pre-op and post-op (tissue augmentation) and again at sacrifice after healing periods of 4, 8, and 24weeks. They were then digitized to allow for superimposition. Values of linear and volumetric changes were calculated. The median increase (pre-op to post-op) in buccal volume measured 0.92mm for VCMX, 1.47mm for SCTG, and 0.24mm for SH. The values (pre-op to sacrifice) were -0.25mm for VCMX, 0.52mm for SCTG, and -0.06mm for group SH. The median ridge width 2mm below the crest measured -0.26mm for VCMX, 0.53mm for SCTG, and -0.15mm for SH (pre-op to sacrifice). Volume augmentation using VCMX and SCTG resulted in an increase in ridge dimension (pre- to post-op). During the follow-up, the volume decreased in all three groups to a level close to the situation prior to surgery. Soft tissue volume augmentation around dental implants is usually performed using the patient's own tissue. This therapy is associated with an increased morbidity due to a second surgical site. Soft tissue volume at implant sites can be augmented using VCMX and SCTG. The gain on top of the ridge appears not to be stable during the follow-up in both groups.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call