Abstract

AbstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to compare the results of vitrectomy performed in patients' worse eyes with diabetic macular oedema to the results of continuous anti‐VEGF treatment performed in patients' fellow eyes.Methods: A retrospective interventional study of patients with diabetic macular edema in both eyes. The better eye was always qualified for aflibercept injections (group 1), and the worse eye was scheduled for vitrectomy (group 2). The follow‐up lasted 12 months. The following parameters were measured: visual acuity (V), central retinal thickness (CRT), maximum retinal thickness (MRT), central choroidal thickness (CCT), superficial (sFAZ) and deep fovea avascular zone (dFAZ), and vessel density at the level of superficial (sVD) and deep (dVD) retinal vessels.Results: None of the analysed factors differed between groups with statistical significance at any timepoint. The time of recovery of vision was identical in both eyes (F = 0.91, p = 0.449). The final sFAZ was significantly smaller for group 2 (median 196 μm), than for group one (median 375 μm; U = 101.0; p = 0.022; r = 0.44).Conclusion: Both techniques resulted in similar improvements in visual acuity and decreases in CRT after one year. sFAZ decreased in all eyes, with a higher extent after vitrectomy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.