Visually guided self-motion does not impair multiple object-tracking

Abstract

Farrell & Robertson. (1998). Mental rotation and the automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(1), 227-233. Farrell &Thomson. (1998). Automatic spatial updating during locomotion without vision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Sect A-Human Experimental Psychology, 51(3), 637-654. Foo, Warren, Douchon & Tarr. (2005). Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Mapversus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 195–215 Pick, Heinrichs, Montello, Smith, Sullivan, & Thompson. (1995). Topographic map reading. In P. Hancock, J. Flach, J. Caird and K. Vicente (eds.), Local Applications of the Ecological Approach to Human-Machine Systems (pp. 255–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Riecke & Bulthoff. (2004). Spatial updating in real and virtual environments: contribution and interaction of visual and vestibular cues. Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, 73, 9-17. Riecke, von der Heyde, & Bulthoff. (2009). Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflexlike spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2(3), 183-215. Thorndyke & Hayes-Roth. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 560-589. Waller, Loomis, Golledge, & Beall. (2000). Place learning in humans: The role of distance and direction information. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2, 333–354. People are impaired at tracking when they simultaneously move through the environment • Object tracking and spatial updating rely on the same spatial process