Abstract

The visualization score of hepatobiliary-phase (HBP) images has been introduced as an image quality index for gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. It may be associated with hepatic function and could have an implication on the diagnostic accuracy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To investigate the association between the visualization score of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and clinical factors and to evaluate its effect on the diagnostic accuracy for HCC ≤ 3.0 cm. Retrospective. A total of 493 focal lesions from 397 patients. A 5-T or 3.0 -T with pre/postcontrast T1-weighted 3D gradient echo sequence, and T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence ASSESSMENT: Child-Pugh classification and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score were assessed. Three readers evaluated the visualization score of each MRI examination (A, no or minimal; B, moderate; and C, severe limitations), and major features (arterial-phase hyperenhancement, washout, enhancing capsule, threshold growth) and ancillary features of each focal lesion. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine significant clinical factors associated with a suboptimal visualization score (B or C). Generalized estimating equations were used to compare the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing HCC between the two group (visualization score A vs. B or C). A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Of the 397 MRI examinations, the incidence of suboptimal visualization score was 13%. A suboptimal visualization score was significantly associated with Child-Pugh classification B or C (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=15.2) and ALBI grade 2 or 3 (OR=4.7). Compared with the visualization score A group, the suboptimal visualization score group showed significantly lower sensitivity (56.8% vs. 75.2%) and less frequent washout in HCC (62.2% vs. 84.0%). The visualization score on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI can be an important image quality index and the diagnostic accuracy for HCC ≤ 3.0 cm may not be sufficient in the suboptimal visualization score group. 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call