Abstract

To investigate the role of subcellular localization in regulating the specificity of G protein betagamma signaling, we have applied the strategy of bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) to visualize betagamma dimers in vivo. We fused an amino-terminal yellow fluorescent protein fragment to beta and a carboxyl-terminal yellow fluorescent protein fragment to gamma. When expressed together, these two proteins produced a fluorescent signal in human embryonic kidney 293 cells that was not obtained with either subunit alone. Fluorescence was dependent on betagamma assembly in that it was not obtained using beta2 and gamma1, which do not form a functional dimer. In addition to assembly, BiFC betagamma complexes were functional as demonstrated by more specific plasma membrane labeling than was obtained with individually tagged fluorescent beta and gamma subunits and by their abilities to potentiate activation of adenylyl cyclase by alpha(s) in COS-7 cells. To investigate isoform-dependent targeting specificity, the localization patterns of dimers formed by pair-wise combinations of three different beta subunits with three different gamma subunits were compared. BiFC betagamma complexes containing either beta1 or beta2 localized to the plasma membrane, whereas those containing beta5 accumulated in the cytosol or on intracellular membranes. These results indicate that the beta subunit can direct trafficking of the gamma subunit. Taken together with previous observations, these results show that the G protein alpha, beta, and gamma subunits all play roles in targeting each other. This method of specifically visualizing betagamma dimers will have many applications in sorting out roles for particular betagamma complexes in a wide variety of cell types.

Highlights

  • More than a thousand G protein-coupled receptors play roles in a vast range of biological processes

  • This study showed that the ␤ subunit can direct ␤␥ targeting in that complexes containing either ␤1 or ␤2 localized to the plasma membrane, whereas those containing ␤5 accumulated in the cytosol or on intracellular membranes

  • Expressing both of these YFP-N-␤ and YFP-C-␥ constructs resulted in a fluorescence signal that was enriched on the plasma membrane (Fig. 2 and Supplemental Video 1), whereas expressing either recombinant protein alone did not produce a detectable fluorescent signal

Read more

Summary

The abbreviations used are

BiFC, bimolecular fluorescence complementation; GFP, green fluorescent protein; YFP, yellow fluorescent protein; CFP, cyan fluorescent protein; mRFP, monomeric red fluorescent protein; HEK cells, human embryonic kidney cells; ECFP, enhanced CFP; RGS, regulator of G protein signaling. Procedure enables visualization of ␤␥ pairs that form complexes, producing no fluorescence for a ␤␥ combination known to be unable to assemble. This study showed that the ␤ subunit can direct ␤␥ targeting in that complexes containing either ␤1 or ␤2 localized to the plasma membrane, whereas those containing ␤5 accumulated in the cytosol or on intracellular membranes. This method of visualizing ␤␥ dimers will have many applications in sorting out the roles of particular ␤␥ complexes in a wide variety of cells and tissues

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call