Abstract

9-Aminoacridine forms a crystalline complex with the dinucleoside monophosphate, 5-iodocytidylyl(3′–5′)guanosine (iodoCpG). These crystals are monoclinic, space group P2 1 with a = 13.98 A ̊ , b = 30.58 A ̊ , c = 22.47 A ̊ and β = 113.9 °. The structure has been solved to atomic resolution by Patterson and Fourier methods, and refined by a combination of Fourier and sum-function Fourier methods. The asymmetric unit contains four 9-aminoacridine molecules, four iodoCpG molecules and 21 water molecules, a total of 245 atoms. 9-Aminoacridine demonstrates two different intercalative binding modes and, along with these, two slightly different intercalative geometries in this model system. The first of these is very nearly symmetric, the 9-amino group lying in the narrow groove of the intercalated base-paired nucleotide structure. The second shows grossly asymmetric binding to the dinucleotide, the 9-amino group lying in the wide groove of the structure. Associated with these two different intercalative binding modes is a difference in geometries in the structures. Although both structures demonstrate C3′ endo (3′–5′) C2′ endo mixed sugar puckering patterns (i.e. both cytidine residues have C3′ endo sugar conformations, while both guanosine residues have C2′ endo sugar conformations), with corresponding twist angles between base-pairs of about 10 °, they differ in the magnitude of the helical screw axis dislocation accompanying intercalation (Sobell et al., 1977 a,b). In the pseudosymmetric intercalative structure, this value is about +0.5 Å, whereas in the asymmetric intercalative structure this value is about +2.7 Å. These conformational differences can be best described as a “sliding” of base-pairs on the intercalated acridine molecule. Although the pseudosymmetric intercalative structure can be used in 9-aminoacridine-DNA binding, the asymmetric intercalative structure cannot since this poses stereochemical difficulties in connecting neighboring sugar-phosphate chains to the intercalated dinucleotide. It is possible, however, that the asymmetric binding mode is related to the mechanism of 9-aminoacridine-induced frameshift mutagenesis (Sakore et al., 1977), and we discuss this possibility here in further detail.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.